data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ccd76/ccd76e9b96a14f6bf3550ba99d4cadbd72388cc2" alt=""
Quick Plot Synopsis
Up north, the military are testing the radar net for gaps. One pilot, Mitch MacAfee (Jeff Morrow) sees a big blurry shape whoosh past him. He calls in a UFO and gets heat for it, until a downed airliner also called in a UFO before it was lost. While flying back to Washington, Mitch's plane is attacked by the thing and downed. Pierre, a French Canadian farmer, takes care of them, but sees something one night that frightens him. (the beast) In Washington, they learn of another plane lost after reporting a UFO. The brass are upset at a lack of radar confirmation. Sally (Mitch's love interest) suggests reviewing research balloon cameras. The film reveals the big ugly bird. The Air Force tries to shoot it down, but it's invulnerable to weapons. Martial law is declared. Everyone is ordered to say indoors. Lacking easy prey, the bird attacks ground targets. World wide panic ensues. People run, buildings fall, trains are snatched up. Even nukes have no effect. It has an anti-matter shield. Analysis of a feather fragment tells them that the bird must have come through space from an anti-matter galaxy. (?!) They worry about why the bird is on earth. Sally thinks it came to lay eggs. Sure enough, they find a nest near Pierre's farm. They shoot and break the egg. The bird is enraged and goes on a destructive rampage. Mitch figures out that a "meson gun" that will shoot subatomic particles at the bird's shield, thereby neutralizing it. Through several failed attempts, Mitch succeeds in building his meson gun. They mount it in the tail of a B-25.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/30f57/30f57ef3278f38ed0b2bbec1bf53c4b687e95900" alt=""
Why is this movie fun?
The bird monster is so bad, so obviously a puppet, she's fun to watch. (She, because she lays an egg) Also fun is seeing how seriously the actors play their parts, not knowing during filming how ridiculous the monster would be.
Cold War Angle
In as much as some prior monsters were personifications of atomic power (Godzilla) or metaphors for enemy attack (Deadly Mantis), the Claw could be seen in this light too. The radar, jets and generals are all of that era. Those things aside, however, the tale falters as a metaphor because of the absurdity.
Notes
What Were They Thinking? -- How could anyone release such an obvious loser? It's an interesting little study into the tough world of B films. Sam Katzman had produced over 200 movies before The Claw including the passable It Came From Beneath The Sea ('55) and the classic Earth vs. The Flying Saucers ('56). Both of those had Ray Harryhausen to create the special effects. How could an experienced and successful (in the B market) producer come out with such a turkey? (literally). He didn't plan to.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/de714/de714287bbb56b1fbdf999d97b63b380a22c79ee" alt=""
Plane Crazy -- Amid the usual P-80s stock footage is a less common sighting. We get a takeoff shot of two Avro Canada CF-100 all-weather interceptors. Part of Canada's strategic defense.
Stock Footage & Switcharoo -- Note in the Bird vs. Squadron scene, how P-80s fly up, but F-86s fire, and then become F-106 models when the bird chomps them. Also note when Mitch is flying back to New York, he's in a DC-6, but after the bird hits them, it's a model of a B-29 that's smoking and spinning down. No points awarded for continuity. Sharp eyed film buffs will also note that the panic-in-the-streets scenes were lifted from prior films too. Earth vs. The Flying Saucers, which lifted it from The Day the Earth Stood Still and many others.
Bottom line? Watch The Claw, not because it's so good, but because it is a benchmark in how absurdly bad a B-grade sci-fi could get in the 50s. This is one of those movies which became iconic -- referenced, spoofed and alluded to in later movies. For cultural reasons alone, it's worth seeing at least once.
5 comments:
As you say, before CGI, flying creature effects were very difficult. Heck, that's why even in 1978, "Superman: the Movie" had the major tagline "You'll believe a man can fly!"
So, Katzman was already delusional if he thought he'd get an acceptable bird for nothing.
What I'm curious about is, if Katzman had a vision of what the bird should look like, why a bundle of sketches weren't sent to Mexico? Even at this bottom end of the budget totem pole, I'd still expect a few production sketches should have been mailed up for approval.
Hi Blaze,
Yes, how this bird-monster puppet managed to get through is an interesting mystery. You would think there were a few concept sketches. Maybe there were. Could have been an over-effective salesmen who convinced Katzman, et al, about how "great" the monster puppet would be, and Katzman believed him.
I've worked on several projects, in which a subcontractor has delayed and promised, and made excuses until the last minute, when we had little choice but to accept what they delivered. There was no time to do it over. Maybe that happened to Katzman too. :-)
One of the things I've thought about this movie, is how this could have been a early Rodan.
I've always been suspicious of Katzman's claim. There's a rear screen projection of a parachutist being gobbled up from behind by footage of the space turkey. Someone on the production team had to have seen the thing in order to shoot that footage.
Howdy Movie Fans,
First off, Mara Corday alone is worth the price of admission>
Yes, the plot line is as thin as an old pair of socks.
The palaver between Morris Ankrum and Jeff Morrow, "you just bought yourself some more of my time Son." is typical 50's vintage.
The line between Jeff Morrow and the air force security at his hotel room, he is wearing his pajama bottoms, "you keep your shirt on while I get my pants on" is a good chuckle.
Also when Morrow asks Corday if she can handle a Weatherby magnum rifle she replies that she was raised on a ranch in Montana - yup, makes sense to me.
When the .340 caliber bullets make huge holes in the eggs, Roy Weatherby must have been tickled with the "free" advertising.
Do you think they made a giant omlette for the film crew?
Add it all up and it is a fun movie, nothing more nor nothing less.
See you at the movies.
John
Yes, I have seen it several times and plan to watch it again in one of those "get me out of this century for a while" moments.
Post a Comment